Q5: Learning-before-adaptation priority

You argue that learning (CS correction) must precede adaptation (CA correction) because:

• learning is low-risk, localized
• adaptation is high-risk, systemic
• AA requires isolating the source of failure

Here is the precise question:

Is this priority absolute, or conditional?

That is:

• Are there situations where CA must change before CS,

even though this violates the usual diagnostic order?

• Or is “learning before adaptation” a hard rule in RF?

One sentence is enough.

evolutionary, adaptation appears first

Good — that pins it down.

So, in RF terms:

• Evolutionarily, adaptation (A) appears before learning (S)

— blind structural change precedes knowledge.

• Ontogenetically / consciously, once AA exists,

learning-before-adaptation becomes the accountable strategy.

• The priority rule is therefore conditional, not absolute:
  • pre-conscious systems adapt first
  • conscious rozums learn first
• RF is layered in time, not flat.

That resolves Question 5 cleanly.

Site map: The Three Descriptive Axioms • The RO Formula • Consciousness & Experience • The God Trap & Propaganda • The Duck Test • Applications • FAQ • Examples & Case Studies • Glossary • Resources • Preprint: doi:10.5281/zenodo.17862910

---

The site is under construction. Please, be patient. And come later, if you want.