Перегляд вихідного коду сторінки Q10: The Duck Test as method

Your full Duck Test requires continuous skepticism and network feedback.

The question is:

'''Can excessive skepticism itself become a failure mode in RF?'''

If yes:
* how would RF detect it using its own tools?

One sentence is enough.

===== permanent thinking - the most expensive mode. =====

Yes — that sentence ''is'' the answer.

=== '''Q10 — closed''' ===

Within RF:
* '''Permanent thinking''' is the '''most expensive mode'''  
* Excessive skepticism:  
** drains resources  
** lowers RO through indecision  
** threatens EA (existence)  
* So skepticism itself becomes a '''failure mode''' when:  
** its cost exceeds survival value  
* RF detects this the same way it detects all failures:  
** sustained '''RO degradation'''  
** without compensatory learning or adaptation  
* The system must '''satisfice''', not maximize doubt

So the Duck Test must be '''used''', not worshipped.

That closes Question 10.

{{sitemap}}